Living collection
Skills for Claude Code, Codex and Coding Agents by Task
25 resourcesOrganized by use

Why I make these lists

Using AI or having a good setup is no longer enough. Things change so quickly that keeping up takes hours of testing, reading and far too many open tabs. I love doing that work. I enjoy discovering tools, trying them and separating what is useful from what is not. That is why I make these collections: I bring together what I try and the opinions that actually help you decide. The idea is simple: save you time and give you something you can act on. If something is missing, or you know a tool that belongs here, tell me.
Signed: Dani
Choose by task, then by agent
Start with the job you need done. Research, interface review and repeatable workflows call for different resources. This catalog is organized by use case. A skill, a plugin, an MCP connection and an external service can work together, but they have different setup and maintenance costs.
For Claude Code, check the installation method and permissions. For Codex, look for documented support, required files, commands and dependencies. Apply the same test to other agents. An agent label helps you find candidates; it is not evidence of a successful test.
Explore by category
Research, web and data
3 resourcesProductivity and focus
3 resourcesAutomation and workflows
1 resourcesDesign and frontend
6 here · 9 totalSystems and infrastructure
1 resourcesMarketing and content
6 here · 8 totalFull profiles and sources
Watch
Breaks a video into frames, audio and a transcript so an agent can examine what it actually contains.
Best for: Investigating video content through frames and transcripts.
Why it belongs here. Brings visual and spoken evidence together when a video is the source material.
Its limit. Frame sampling can miss brief details and transcripts can contain errors; check decisive moments against the original video.
It gives the agent a set of frames and words from a video. You still need to check whether those samples capture the part that matters.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. Check the repository's setup and required video tools for the agent and operating system you use.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. The workflow may require local video and transcription tools or external services. Check those requirements before treating the skill as a free one-step operation.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it to inspect a video claim or extract evidence for research, then return to the original timestamp before citing a detail.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Last 30 Days
Looks for current conversations where they happen and separates signals, opinions and noise before research.
Best for: Investigating recent discussions and signals with links to their sources.
Why it belongs here. Helps an agent find recent public conversation and keep a route back to each source.
Its limit. Coverage depends on available platforms and access. A recent sample is not a representative survey.
It helps you hear what people are saying now and find the original posts. Check what it could not reach before drawing a conclusion.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. Check the skill's current agent setup and platform access requirements in its repository.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. The skill may rely on services with their own limits or access terms; check the sources needed for your research before running it.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it to collect recent questions about a market and follow the linked posts before summarizing recurring themes.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Firecrawl
A web extraction API that turns pages into cleaner Markdown or structured data for agents and language models.
Best for: Giving a coding agent access to current web content.
Why it belongs here. Provides reusable web extraction when an agent needs to work with pages and external data.
Its limit. Extraction can miss or distort content. Check the result and the site's terms before relying on it.
It helps an agent read web pages in a usable format. It does not decide whether the extracted information is correct.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. Firecrawl is an API service, not an interchangeable skill. Verify the integration and credentials required by your agent.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. Hosted usage and self-hosting have different plans and maintenance costs. Check current pricing and infrastructure requirements.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it for a repeatable collection of pages; for a single lookup, first consider the agent's existing browsing tools.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Ponytail
Applies discipline to context and generated code: retain what matters and prune unnecessary work.
Best for: Reducing avoidable code and context in coding-agent sessions.
Why it belongs here. Pushes the agent to solve the actual request with less unnecessary code and context.
Its limit. Shorter output is not automatically better. Missing requirements or useful explanation can cost more in rework.
It asks the agent to do the job with fewer extras. Check that the finished change still covers what you asked for.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. Follow the repository's installation instructions for the agent you use; do not infer support from a generic skill label.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. The useful comparison is total work, including corrections, rather than a token claim taken from a project description.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Try it on a bounded coding task and compare the result, review effort and corrections with the normal workflow.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
I have ADHD
Reformats agent replies around the next action and numbered steps, with less preamble and filler.
Best for: Coding sessions that benefit from direct instructions and numbered steps.
Why it belongs here. Makes the next action easier to find when a long answer would add friction.
Its limit. A shorter reply can omit context that matters for a difficult decision. Ask for the missing reasoning when the stakes require it.
It changes how the agent talks to you: action first, then the steps. It does not change the underlying model's ability.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. The repository defines the actual installation route; check it before assuming the same setup works in another agent.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. There is no proven productivity gain for every user. Evaluate the reading and correction effort in your own workflow.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it for routine coding steps when direct, numbered guidance helps you keep your place.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Claudex Loop
Combines planning, review and code inspection across Claude Code and Codex, with decisions recorded in the project.
Why it belongs here. Combines planning, review and code inspection across Claude Code and Codex, with decisions recorded in the project.
Its limit. Adds time and usage. Agreement between two models does not prove that a solution works.
One proposes a solution and the other looks for holes. You decide which findings matter, and tests check the result.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Details. The complete workflow needs authenticated Claude Code and Codex CLIs and Python 3.10 or later. Plugin commands use the /claudex-loop: prefix.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Details. The MIT-licensed code costs €0. Review rounds use both provider accounts and their usage limits or billing.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Details. Useful for reviewing changes with several decisions. For a small edit, a one-off review avoids running the whole workflow.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Details. Checked against the official repository on 21 September 2026 and the published review. No independent productivity or cost comparison.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
MiroFish
Simulates many AI agents to explore possible social, market or political reactions to a scenario.
Best for: Generating hypotheses about reactions to a launch or decision.
Why it belongs here. Offers a structured way to explore possible reactions before asking real people.
Its limit. Simulated agents can produce plausible explanations without real-world evidence. Their output does not replace customer research.
Give it a scenario and it returns simulated reactions. Treat those reactions as questions to investigate, not a forecast you can trust on its own.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. This is an application with its own runtime and model requirements, not a portable skill for every coding agent.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. Running many AI agents requires model access and compute. Check the project's current setup before estimating the cost of a run.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use a simulation to surface assumptions about a launch, then compare them with real interviews or observed behavior.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Impeccable
Turns frontend design into decisions about hierarchy, color, typography, interaction and finish.
Best for: Reviewing and refining interfaces made with coding agents.
Why it belongs here. Gives an agent concrete design criteria for evaluating an interface instead of asking for vague visual polish.
Its limit. Rules and prompts do not establish that a screen serves its users; review the result in the actual browser and task context.
It gives the agent a sharper checklist for design decisions. The final screen still needs a human look and a real use case.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. The project documents support for several coding agents; verify the current installation route for your agent and version.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. The repository publishes reusable design guidance. Budget time to review changes and check any additional tool or model requirements in the chosen workflow.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it to critique hierarchy, consistency and interface details after you have a working screen to inspect.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Claude Code /design
A Claude Code design workflow that syncs local HTML components and previews with a design-system project in claude.ai.
Best for: Keeping generated interfaces aligned with a local component library.
Why it belongs here. Connects existing visual components to an agent's interface generation work.
Its limit. The Claude-specific workflow does not establish an equivalent feature in Codex or another agent.
It gives Claude examples from your own components so a generated screen can follow your visual system more closely.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. The documented workflow is for Claude's tools. Do not label it Codex-compatible without separate evidence.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. Account, product and setup requirements can change; check the current official documentation before planning a production workflow.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Use it after you have real components and previews worth reusing, then inspect the generated interface against the source design.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
UI UX Pro Max Skill
For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. Turns any coding agent into a design-aware assistant: 192 industry-specific rules, 79 searchable styles, 74 typographic pairings, and automatic generation of complete design systems before any code is written.
Why it belongs here. For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. Turns any coding agent into a design-aware assistant: 192 industry-specific rules, 79 searchable styles, 74 typographic pairings, and automatic generation of complete design systems before any code is written.
Its limit. No MCP integration: works as a skill installed in the assistant's directory, not as a server external tools can connect to. The free version generates no real visual assets and the premium tier has no published price.
Lets your AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and others) choose colors, typefaces, landing page patterns, and antipatterns before generating interface code. Instead of asking for "make me a landing page" and crossing your fingers, you give it design judgment tailored to your industry.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Works with more than 20 assistants: Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Warp, Augment, and others. Supports 22 tech stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Flutter, SwiftUI, Tailwind, etc.). Requires Python 3.x and Node.js/npm to install the CLI.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Basic version free under MIT license. Premium version with brand identity, AI-powered visual asset generation, and dedicated support; price not published on the official website as of the review date (September 2026).
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. Install the CLI with npm install -g ui-ux-pro-max-cli, run uipro init --ai claude in your project, and ask "Build a landing page for my SaaS product". The skill generates a complete design system (palette, typography, pattern, antipatterns) before the agent writes any code.
Alternative. For injecting real visual references instead of abstract rules, Refero uses web screenshots via MCP. For ready-made components, conventional UI kits (shadcn/ui, Tailwind UI) solve the problem without an intermediate skill.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Reviewed from the repository README and the official website (uupm.cc) in September 2026. No hands-on test run; conclusions based on public documentation.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Frontend Design de Anthropic
For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. Official Anthropic skill for giving coding agents art direction. Free, compatible with Claude Code, Claude.ai, and the Claude API (and with Codex and Cursor per the Agent Skills standard). Forces the agent to plan palette, typography, and composition before writing code.
Why it belongs here. For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. Official Anthropic skill for giving coding agents art direction. Free, compatible with Claude Code, Claude.ai, and the Claude API (and with Codex and Cursor per the Agent Skills standard). Forces the agent to plan palette, typography, and composition before writing code.
Its limit. Does not generate original design or replace a proper design system. Results depend on the brief, references, and the model. The license is proprietary (Anthropic Commercial Terms), not open source.
An instruction file that teaches your coding agent to think about visual design before writing CSS. Plans colors, typography, and composition so the result does not look like a generic template.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Claude Code, Claude.ai, Claude API and, per the Agent Skills standard, also Codex and Cursor. Requires an agent compatible with SKILL.md.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Free. The skill has no cost, but the agent usage (Claude Code, API) has its own pricing depending on your plan.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. In Claude Code, register the repository with /plugin marketplace add anthropics/skills and install with /plugin install example-skills@anthropic-agent-skills. Also available on Claude.ai (paid plans) and via the API. Ask the agent to create a landing page and the skill activates visual planning.
Alternative. Manual style prompts, UI UX Pro Max Skill (third-party), or the native Claude Code /design functionality (proprietary, a different product).
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Review published on Marketing Ultra (September 2026), based on official documentation and the repository README. Does not include a locally executed test.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Taste Skill
For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. It turns three common design decisions—variety, motion and density—into explicit controls a SKILL.md-compatible agent can follow.
Why it belongs here. For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. It turns three common design decisions—variety, motion and density—into explicit controls a SKILL.md-compatible agent can follow.
Its limit. The default version 2 is still labelled experimental, and there is no independent evidence showing better results or real adoption.
In plain English: it tells a coding agent how much to risk with composition, how much it can animate, and how much information to fit on each screen.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. The documentation states support for tools that accept SKILL.md files and names Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, v0, Lovable and OpenCode.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Taste Skill is open source under the MIT licence. Any costs for the agent, subscription or API used sit outside the tool itself.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. It can guide a B2B landing page with moderate variety, restrained motion and enough density to explain the offer without turning it into a dashboard.
Alternative. The verified alternative is manually reviewing every generated interface and requesting hierarchy, spacing and animation corrections one by one.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Official sources reviewed on 23 September 2026. Compatibility is stated by the project and does not amount to local testing.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Emil Design Engineering (Emil Kowalski Skills)
For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. It provides concrete criteria for agents to decide when to animate, for how long and how to handle microinteractions without adding motion for its own sake.
Why it belongs here. For giving an agent design criteria before it builds or reviews an interface. It provides concrete criteria for agents to decide when to animate, for how long and how to handle microinteractions without adding motion for its own sake.
Its limit. It codifies Emil Kowalski’s prescriptive vision, but does not replace an accessibility audit, testing on real devices or the judgment of a senior designer.
Put plainly: it gives your coding assistant a demanding cheat sheet so buttons, menus and transitions respond with more purpose and fewer fireworks.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. The README documents installation through npx skills@latest add emilkowalski/skills. The attached evidence does not confirm specific CLI destinations or a local installation for this review.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. The repository is published as open source under the MIT license and does not document a purchase price. Costs for the coding assistant or infrastructure used fall outside the available evidence.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. Install the package and request a review of a dropdown with an ease-in curve, 400 ms duration and a centered origin, asking for a Before/After table.
Alternative. Ask a senior designer to manually review animations and interaction details in their real-world context.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Profile reviewed on September 25, 2026 using the repository, official page, README, the SKILL.md pinned to a commit and license information. No local test was run.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Omarchy
An Arch Linux and Hyprland setup with coding agents and development tools preconfigured.
Best for: Starting a Linux coding environment without assembling every tool yourself.
Why it belongs here. Bundles a development desktop and common agent tools into one setup.
Its limit. A preconfigured distribution still requires hardware compatibility checks, updates and comfort with its system choices.
It is a ready-made Linux desktop for development, not a skill that you install into Claude Code or Codex.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Setup. Check hardware and installation documentation for the distribution. Bundled agents may have their own accounts and requirements.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Practical cost. The distribution is available as software, but the computer, setup time and any agent subscriptions remain separate costs.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Useful route. Try it in a reversible environment before moving a working development machine to a new distribution.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Evidence. This entry uses the existing Marketing Ultra review and the project's official source. Author documentation is not described as a hands-on test by Dani.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
marketingskills
For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. 50 specialized marketing instructions (CRO, SEO, ads, copywriting, analytics) that any code agent can use for free. MIT license, no API key, one command to install.
Why it belongs here. For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. 50 specialized marketing instructions (CRO, SEO, ads, copywriting, analytics) that any code agent can use for free. MIT license, no API key, one command to install.
Its limit. Everything in English: instructions, templates, and documentation. Getting output in another language requires asking the agent explicitly.
These are text files that teach marketing to your code agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex). Tell it to "optimize this landing page" and instead of winging it, it applies a real CRO framework.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Windsurf, and any agent supporting the Agent Skills spec. Node.js required for installation via npx.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Free. MIT license. No API key, no subscription, no usage limits. Partners (Converly, Ploy) fund development but do not influence core skill recommendations according to the project documentation.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. Install all 50 skills with npx skills add coreyhaines31/marketingskills, fill in the product-marketing.md document with your product context, then ask the agent to audit a landing page for conversion.
Alternative. Write your own Markdown skills tailored to your workflow, or use system prompts directly in the agent without an external library.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Article based on official repository documentation (README, website) as of September 2026. No hands-on testing by the Marketing Ultra team.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
HeliosGen
Builds image and video workflows with nodes and documents an optional Codex CLI integration for GPT Image 2.
Why it belongs here. Builds image and video workflows with nodes and documents an optional Codex CLI integration for GPT Image 2.
Its limit. The application is local, but generation depends on external services. Project maturity and available builds limit production use.
Connect text, reference images and a model like parts of a circuit. Save the route and use it again.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Details. The documentation offers a macOS Apple Silicon download. Windows and Linux require building from source. The optional Codex route has separate requirements.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Details. The MIT-licensed application is free. Generation uses kie.ai credits or the configured provider account. There is no universal price per image.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Details. Useful for preparing creative variations and repeating a sequence. A direct generation interface is simpler when you only need one image.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Details. Official sources and the published review checked on 21 September 2026. Codex integration is documented, not presented as independent testing.
Official repository ↗Available downloads ↗Official gallery ↗
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Claude Ads
For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. The only open source resource that audits up to 12 advertising platforms with 33 skills, findings classified by confidence level, and investment-weighted scoring — all from Claude Code.
Why it belongs here. For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. The only open source resource that audits up to 12 advertising platforms with 33 skills, findings classified by confidence level, and investment-weighted scoring — all from Claude Code.
Its limit. Requires account exports or real API access to function. Installation alone analyzes nothing, and account-level operations require connectors and manual per-platform authorization.
A free skill that reviews the health of your ad accounts (Google Ads, Meta, TikTok and more) from Claude Code. It tells you what is wrong, how confident it is, and what to prioritize. It does not touch anything without your permission.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Claude Code is the canonical environment. Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Windsurf and Goose can consume the skill files where their runtime allows, but with no published functional proof outside Claude Code.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Free and MIT-licensed. No subscription, no external server, no per-account fee. Indirect costs are the Claude Code subscription and tokens consumed during the audit.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. Install with /plugin marketplace add AgriciDaniel/claude-ads, configure with /ads setup and run /ads audit google for a Google Ads audit with health score and prioritized findings.
Alternative. Manual PPC audits platform by platform, or paid SaaS tools like Optmyzr, Adalysis or Opteo (typically focused on one or two platforms).
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Reviewed at Marketing Ultra on September 22, 2026 based on the README, official website and repository documentation. No functional test was run on live accounts.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Claude SEO
For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. Full SEO kit for Claude Code with 18 agents that prioritize findings and add falsifiability to every recommendation. MIT, no cost per domain.
Why it belongs here. For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. Full SEO kit for Claude Code with 18 agents that prioritize findings and add falsifiability to every recommendation. MIT, no cost per domain.
Its limit. The SKILL.md injects a promotional footer for the author's community into generated reports. The 0–100 score is an internal heuristic, not a Google signal.
Give it a URL and Claude Code returns an SEO report with issues sorted by priority and a concrete way to check whether each fix worked.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Claude Code on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Requires Python 3.10+. Codex SEO is a separate port outside this package.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. The skill is free (MIT). You need an active Claude Code subscription. Since v2.3.1, five agents run on Opus, which increases consumption. Optional extensions (DataForSEO, Ahrefs) require separate paid accounts.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. /seo audit https://your-site.com for a full audit with up to 18 agents. /seo page for a single URL. /seo schema for markup.
Alternative. Screaming Frog for deep crawling, Ahrefs Site Audit for link analysis with its own index, Semrush Site Audit for competitive visibility.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Data from the GitHub repository, official website, and public sources (Reddit, YouTube). The tool was not run for this review. September 2026.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Marketing Skills de Alireza Rezvani
For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. Organized suite of marketing skills with shared brand context and organization across 8 pods (content, SEO and AEO, local SEO, CRO, channels, growth, market intelligence, and sales), compatible with 13 coding agents.
Why it belongs here. For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. Organized suite of marketing skills with shared brand context and organization across 8 pods (content, SEO and AEO, local SEO, CRO, channels, growth, market intelligence, and sales), compatible with 13 coding agents.
Its limit. No evidence of real marketing use. The 26,000+ stars belong to the full multidisciplinary repository, not the marketing package. The main skill is a router that does not execute work on its own.
A set of instructions that teach your coding assistant to handle marketing tasks (emails, CRO, SEO, analytics) without you having to explain everything from scratch every time. Free, open source, for Claude Code and 12 other agents.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. The README declares support for 13 platforms: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Aider, Windsurf, Kilo Code, OpenCode, Augment, Antigravity, Hermes Agent, Mistral Vibe, and OpenClaw. Compatibility documented in README and frontmatter, not verified with execution tests. On Windows, requires cloning with symlinks enabled (Developer Mode).
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. Open source under MIT license. No licensing fee or subscription. The only cost is the coding agent you run it on (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc.) and the time to configure the brand context.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. In Claude Code: /plugin marketplace add alirezarezvani/claude-skills and then /plugin install marketing-skills@claude-code-skills. The router loads the index and distributes work to the specialists in each pod.
Alternative. The Corey Haines package covers similar ground with less complexity. Rezvani bets on depth and scale (more specialists, more scripts, more pods); Haines on a more direct and lightweight approach.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review basis. Reviewed from the repository README, the marketing-skills index SKILL.md, and the verified structure of the marketing-skill directory on GitHub. No hands-on execution test. Last repository activity: August 2026. Full repo stars: 26,213 as of review date (September 2026).
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
OpenClaudia Skills
For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. It bundles more than 70 marketing skills into an open package and provides a specific route for querying GA4 reports and conclusions from a coding agent.
Why it belongs here. For extending an agent’s work into research, messaging and conversion. It bundles more than 70 marketing skills into an open package and provides a specific route for querying GA4 reports and conclusions from a coding agent.
Its limit. The skill does not include automatic Analytics access: it requires Google OAuth, property access, and human verification of reports; nor is there a documented independent execution.
In plain English: it lets you ask an assistant to query GA4 from the terminal and organize the data, provided you first connect your Google account correctly.
Compatibility and setupRequirements and agent differences
Compatibility. Claude Code is the main documented requirement. Codex supports a specific path for skills; Grok CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and Windsurf can use the content as instructions or rules, without a guarantee of identical operation.
Real cost and licenseResource, agent and extra costs
Cost. The package is free and MIT-licensed. Credentials, permissions, and any external services needed for other skills fall outside that free offering.
Example and alternativeWhen it helps and what else to use
Example. Install google-analytics, configure OAuth, and request a basic report from an authorized property, then compare its figures with GA4.
Alternative. Keeping analysis in the original SaaS dashboards avoids adding another layer of instructions and credentials, although it requires switching interfaces for each task.
Sources and reviewWhat is documented and what was tested
Review. Profile reviewed on September 25, 2026, based on the OpenClaudia Skills repository and main documentation.
Resource detailsEditorial profile and links
Check the evidence before installing
Each entry should explain what a resource helps with, what it needs, where its compatibility claim comes from and what its limits are. Link to a published review when one exists. A marketing or design collection can be linked once its full English version is published. For ready-made components, use the existing UI component libraries collection.
Questions about coding-agent resources
Will a Claude Code skill work in Codex?
It depends on the package. Check its format, installation steps, commands and external tools. Author documentation supports a documented label. A tested label requires a reproducible run on the relevant version. Otherwise, mark it unverified.
How do a skill, a plugin, an MCP connection and an agent differ?
A skill provides reusable instructions for a task. A plugin extends a product. An MCP connection gives an agent access to external tools or data. An agent combines instructions, tools and autonomy around a goal. They appear together here because readers usually start with a job, not a technical label.
What does “Sources reviewed” mean?
It means the official site, repository or documentation was checked on the stated date. It does not mean Marketing Ultra tested the resource. When there is a hands-on review, the entry links to the full article.



















